Skip to content
  • Home
  • About STC
  • Contact Us
← The Cooperstown Brand May Suffer if Speculative Steroid Abusers are Banished from Baseball’s Hallowed Halls
Celebrating the Black Snake Year the STC Way →

/ American Airlines Looks to Soar Above the Competition with a New Logo

Posted on January 23, 2013 by laurent

Similarities to other major airline logos makes the new “AA” logo devoid of originality

American Airlines has finally rebranded after 44 years of continuity with the legendary double capital “A” and the eagle landing, a major symbol of Americanism.

There is a positive feeling about the dated look of American Airlines, but it’s time to scrap everything and align American with other major carriers/competitors that have rebranded in the last couple of years.

British Airways and, more recently, Air France are great examples. FutureBrand has worked for the last two years with Massimo Vignelli, the original designer for the AA brand, to refresh and bring a much needed new look  for American. The fact that the eagle remains, and is now part of a flying symbol, is a welcome and powerful tribute to the brand; it is sleek, modern and conveys its legacy. But, the eagle gets lost when you look at the whole plane.

Credit – airlinereporter.com

On the other hand, the same elements for different reasons create issues. The new logo fails to distinguish itself from Air France (the red ribbon slanted) or British Airways (the flying red-and-blue ribbon).

The unsurprising treatment of gradients and shadows that have been plaguing the brand and design world for the last couple of years with the “App-ism” treatment have been included in the new American Airlines logo. For some reason, everything needs to look like an app, with a soft bevel, mirror and vintage flaring, plus a layer of gradient or drop shadow in the mix and you have been WordPress-ized.

Credit – money.msn.com

If there was one airline that could claim the Americanism idea, it is American Airlines. So, it is logical that they would include the abstract representation of the American flag on the tail, which has been used to display the main logo in the past. I like the red-and-blue stripes treatment — however it isn’t something unexpected.

And, then, there is the typography treatment. I would have expected to see a customized typeface or something that truly belongs to American Airlines for such an investment. Yet, on that point, it looks like a default font that is both web-friendly and comes with the latest version of your favorite publishing software/word press.

Overall, it looks modern but falls short of surprise and personality. Someone looking at this logo would probably say that it looks nice, then turn the page and move on to something else. Not a great feeling for the amount of work that was put into it.

It may be outdated already.  Just like the latest electronic device one purchases knowing full well something better will be coming out in three months. The debate has already begun on whether this is a great rebranding or not.

For all who fly, for business or pleasure, one thing is for sure, the airline will be judged on the quality of its services, efficiency and the number of on-time flights it can deliver, far more than its logo appeal. Currently, when it comes to air travel (with a few exceptions, Southwest and JetBlue domestically) service has been unacceptable. Let’s see if American can change this perception beyond changing its wardrobe.

This entry was posted in Branding, design, Identity, New York, pictures and tagged Air France, american airlines, American Airlines New logo, Americanism, Branding, British Airways, Logo design, Massimo Vignelli, New logo. Bookmark the permalink.
← The Cooperstown Brand May Suffer if Speculative Steroid Abusers are Banished from Baseball’s Hallowed Halls
Celebrating the Black Snake Year the STC Way →
  • Archives

    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in